The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

This book explores how the powerful Israel lobby shapes U.S. politics and foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East. It reveals the strategies the lobby uses to influence Congress, the presidency, and public discourse, often aligning U.S. policies with Israel’s interests. Written by John J. Mearsheimer, a professor at the University of Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, a professor at Harvard, both renowned experts in international relations. If you're interested in the power dynamics between nations and how policies are crafted behind the scenes, it's a must-read. Now let's dive into the key insights.

4 min read

group of people sitting on chairs
group of people sitting on chairs

The Israel lobby is one of the most influential interest groups in the U.S., shaping both domestic politics and foreign policy with remarkable success. John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt’s analysis reveals how this lobby operates and the broad-reaching effects of its influence on the American political landscape.

How the Israel Lobby Operates

The Israel lobby operates through a well-coordinated network of individuals, organisations, and advocacy groups. At its core is AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), which is the most influential pro-Israel lobbying group in the U.S. AIPAC’s goal is to maintain strong U.S. support for Israel, regardless of the political landscape or who holds power in Washington.The lobby’s influence is felt across several levels of U.S. politics, from Congress to the White House, and even in public discourse.

Influence on U.S. Presidents

One of the most intriguing aspects of the Israel lobby’s power is its influence over U.S. presidents. Despite their personal views, many presidents have found themselves aligning with pro-Israel policies due to the lobby’s pressure. For instance, during his presidency, Jimmy Carter considered appointing George Ball as Secretary of State, but Ball’s criticism of Israel made him a non-starter due to the lobby’s opposition. Likewise, presidential candidates often adjust their rhetoric to avoid alienating Jewish voters and donors who have considerable sway in key swing states like Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania.

Even those in the White House are not immune. The Israel lobby’s influence reaches deep into the executive branch, ensuring that pro-Israel individuals are positioned in critical policy roles. This was notably evident in the administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, where high-level advisors like Martin Indyk, Paul Wolfowitz, and Elliott Abrams helped craft Middle East policies with Israel’s interests in mind. These individuals ensured that Israel’s perspective dominated U.S. foreign policy decisions, particularly in peace negotiations and strategies regarding regional conflicts.

Influence in Congress

Perhaps the most significant influence the Israel lobby has is within Congress. AIPAC is the primary organisation responsible for lobbying members of Congress, ensuring that U.S. policies continue to favour Israel. Politicians who step out of line, such as former Senator Charles Percy, who opposed Israel-friendly policies, often face intense backlash and are politically sidelined. AIPAC’s power comes from its ability to fund political campaigns and shape legislation that aligns with Israel’s interests. For example, pro-Israel congressional staffers have been known to assist in drafting legislation or speeches, ensuring the pro-Israel narrative remains strong.

In Congress, even open debate about U.S.-Israel policy is rare. Most lawmakers, even those who might privately question the nature of U.S. support for Israel, refrain from speaking up publicly due to the risk of losing political support or campaign funding.

Strategic Use of Think Tanks and Media

The Israel lobby has also strategically placed itself in major U.S. think tanks and media outlets to control the narrative surrounding Israel. Think tanks like the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center for Middle East Policy receive significant funding from pro-Israel donors, ensuring that the research and reports they produce are sympathetic to Israel. These think tanks play an essential role in shaping both public opinion and government policy.

In addition, the lobby’s influence extends into mainstream media, where major outlets often take a pro-Israel stance. Rarely do criticisms of Israeli policies appear in editorials, and when they do, they are often met with organised campaigns to suppress these views. For example, National Public Radio (NPR) faced severe backlash for its perceived "anti-Israel" coverage, leading to protests and boycotts organised by pro-Israel groups.

Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy

Since the Six-Day War in 1967, the U.S.-Israel relationship has been the cornerstone of American foreign policy in the Middle East. Washington provides Israel with over $3 billion in annual aid, alongside crucial military and diplomatic support, especially in international forums like the United Nations. However, this support often complicates U.S. relations with other Middle Eastern countries, alienating Arab and Muslim nations and making the U.S. a target of anti-American sentiment.

Critics of the lobby, including Mearsheimer and Walt, argue that this level of support is driven not by shared strategic goals but by domestic political pressure. U.S. policies often contradict America’s broader interests in the region. For instance, Israel’s ongoing settlement expansion in Palestinian territories continues despite U.S. policies opposing such actions. Yet, the U.S. does little to curb these activities due to pressure from the Israel lobby.

Lobby's Power in Presidential Elections

The Israel lobby’s influence also extends to presidential elections. Jewish-American voters, despite being a small percentage of the population, have considerable influence due to their high voter turnout and significant political donations. In fact, Jewish donors provide up to 60% of the campaign funding for Democratic presidential candidates. This financial clout means that both Republican and Democratic candidates must take pro-Israel stances to secure funding and political support during elections.

Once elected, U.S. presidents are mindful of this support. George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq, for example, was influenced by neoconservatives within his administration, many of whom had strong pro-Israel views. Similarly, Bill Clinton’s administration was known for taking an Israel-centric approach to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, making it difficult for Palestinians to see the U.S. as a neutral mediator.

People-Centric Impact

At the heart of the Israel lobby’s influence is its impact on the American people. U.S. taxpayers contribute billions of dollars in aid to Israel each year, often without realising how this money affects their own country’s interests. The U.S.’s close relationship with Israel has contributed to ongoing tensions in the Middle East, indirectly affecting global oil prices, military spending, and the safety of U.S. citizens abroad. By shaping public discourse and ensuring favourable media coverage, the Israel lobby minimises awareness of these broader consequences, keeping U.S. support for Israel intact.

Conclusion

In essence, the Israel lobby’s unmatched political power has shaped U.S. foreign and domestic policies in profound ways. The public rarely sees the full picture, as media and political forces are skewed in favor of Israel. As a result, U.S. policymakers are often left balancing the interests of their constituents with the pressures from this influential lobby.

This book offers a thought-provoking analysis of how powerful interest groups can shape the policies of a global superpower like the United States. Through the insights of renowned scholars John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, this book uncovers the intricate dynamics between the Israel lobby and U.S. government, making it essential reading for anyone interested in geopolitics, international power struggles, and the unseen forces behind policy decisions.